Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Good Work If You Can Get It

Nick, here's your positive, bipartisan future:





Not to belittle Obama's gifts as an orator, but to take him at his word (and as Blue Girl says, we should) all it takes is some sweet talk and compromise and everything inWashington will be roses and peppermints.

Bloody-fucking-horseshit.

That chart up there shows how interested the Republicans are in compromise.  The spike in filibustering (abetted by Harry Reid, duly and dolefully noted) coincides with Democratic control, wherein they obtained enough power to introduce legislation, but not to ram it through in Republican fashion.

The Republicans respond to the hand of conciliation by chewing it off.  Compromise is viewed as weakness; concession on the Left only allows the Right to dig their heels in deeper.

Partisanship DOES serve a purpose, contrary to what the talking heads keep bleating;  it allows for contrasting viewpoints and goals to be thrashed out.  People disagree and that's part of why the system exists the way it is.

Pundits only promulgate the myth of some earlier, animus-free Congress because the arguments make their own, cocktail-party Beltway-centered lives uncomfortable; it's hard to draw up seating charts when there's all this ugly disagreement floating about.  They've found it's so much more civilized, dahling, when you allow the oligarchs a majority to run things.

So now, NOW, when the Democrats (and democrats) are poised to gain some leverage, and activism at all levels are pushing them to act as an Opposition Party and OPPOSE the shortsighted, destructive policies of the Right, Bush and Cheney and other Republicans find a new Religion called Polity.  Bipartisanship! is the new cheer!  And we'll put all this oh-so-dreary animosity behind us.

Until, of course, the Democrats try to actually move the country in a non-corporate direction.

don't get me wrong;  I like Obama and am totally psyched that the Democrats are floating an African-American as a serious Presidential contender.  And he is nearly sure to be a better President than any Republican floated as a candidate in the last thirty years or so.

But I think what he's told us about his tactics and plans for actually governing, as opposed to rabble-rousery, are far short of what will be required in this dreary post-millennial, post-Bush disaster.  He will need far larger cojones than he's shown so far, a Churchillian willingness to go toe-to-toe with his Republican opponents, and, as is so depressingly true for Democrats, a total spine transplant.

Look; Nick, as a Builder, I'm inherently optimistic.  But one thing that can be learned in painfully quick lessons as a Small Business Owner is that optimistic words and cheerful outlook are NOT accepted by the IRS or your employees on payday.  Those words need to be backed up with no-nonsense DEEDS and, preferably, a bank account.  And when the whole building has exploded, burned down, fallen over, THEN sunk into the swamp, it's foolish to pretend there's nothing wrong just because it's uncomfortable to hear.

8 comments:

  1. Every once in a while lately, Obama opens his mouth and sounds like Al Gore. I don't mean he invented anything or wants to save the worlrd from choking on our own collective farts, I mean he sounds like a realist and a policy wonk with some damned good (at least debatable) ideas.

    I'm still not voting for him in the primaries, but I'd be behind him 100% as the nominee (even though I think he should be VP for a bit first).

    Obama has shown a great ability in the past to talk people together, that is, when he bothers to take a day off from campaigning and gets to work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. So why not vote for him?

    As for BP's rant: I feel bad for you dude. A world where its winner take all, no quarter given all the time is a sad, dreary place indeed. It is, quite frankly, a very Karl Rovian place. Do you really believe that Rove's way is the right way?

    I don't. I think Karl Rove has done a lot of harm to the political culture of our country. But the way to reverse that damage is not to embrace Rove's approach. Quite the opposite, though very difficult.

    But I think Obama can pull it off. Though I admit that I do find it depressing that hard-core Democrats believe him to be a simple political opportunist.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ummm, Nick, I know you were mostly on the other side, so you haven't been on the receiving end of Rovian politics, but haven't you noticed that the Republicans are STILL playing by Rovian rules?

    I agree that there's no need to play Rovian to beat the R's. By and large, they're dumb, although good at stragedy.

    But the touchy feely approach is no good; the Dems have GOT to be willing to play hardball with the Right; it's the only thing the Rovians DO understand.

    The Dems have GOT to fight with a winner take all attitude, at least until the Republicans take their foot off our necks. If your opponent is fighting for keeps, but you aren't, you might as well pack it in right now and there's no better example of that than last weekend's game at Lambeau.

    It's not a bleak perspective; it's based on years of understanding. Reality-based, we've been calling it.

    By all means treat your opponent with respect; but don't turn your back and count the silverware before he leaves.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nick, us die-hard Democrats have been burned too many times before to blindly believe that stump speech theatrics can so easily be turned into governance successes.

    Let's see some real skin. Show me the money. Whatever cliche you like. Legislation talks, bullshit walks.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am sure that many Republicans/Conservatices were so opposed to Karl Rove's tactics that they voted against Bush in 2004.

    **crickets**

    ReplyDelete
  6. Us or Them.

    Sad. Truly.

    Here's the problem with "playing hardball"-- you can't stop once you start.

    Anyway, we've had this discussion before and it does not seem to be going anywhere new. You all have fun talking amongst yourselves.

    Peace out.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Oh, nick, I'll vote for Edwards because I like Obama just fine, I just like Edwards better.

    My dream is an E/O '08 ticket. Either end up is just fine.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nick, please don't give up on us. I appreciate your comments, and your ability to challenge our way of thinking. And I mean that sincerely. Otherwise it gets a bit one-sided.

    Obama is my man.

    ReplyDelete