Well, nobody seems to be responding to my more lengthy rants, so I figure I might as well taunt Zelmo...
We had a spirited email exchange on the relative merits of bands who go through membership changes. However, rather than drone on and on about twee english prog bands, we specifically focused on histrionic english hard rock bands.
That's right, we argued about Queen. Or as I used to refer to them, The Bombast Boys.
They played the Bradley Center last night, so we went. The Urinal/Sentinel's review is here, but as with most of their articles, is sadly lacking, IMNSHO. The curse of editors and deadlines, I guess. Lucky for you I'm under no such restrictions. HA!
I'd been a pretty big Queen fan in high school, but the eighties were not kind to the band and I was going in other directions. Of course, since they remained huge in other parts of the world, there was no opportunity to see them round here. Once Freddie died, I missed any opportunity to see one of rock music's great showmen. So I decided that I would probably regret this opportunity, if I didn't take it. At least I would be able to judge for myself, rather than dismissing the efforts without firsthand knowledge.
But the band was always more than Freddie Mercury's back up band. As the review notes, Mercury is simply irreplaceable, nobody could ever fill that spandex. And the band is smart enough not to try.
The selection of Paul Rodgers is one of those things that makes you go “Huh?” when you hear it. what could the workmanlike blues rock sound of Bad Company possible have in common with the Glam rock of Queen? But at several points in the show, it becomes obvious that a significant part of the pairing is the affection and chemistry between rodgers and the other members of the band, especially Brian May. You start to realize that it might be possible for the band to develop a second phase of their career, respectful of the history with Freddie Mercury, but developing in new directions. Gemma Tarlach had an interesting article here on bands who've tried this (although I vehemently disagree with her dismissal of the Ray Wilson Genesis).
Rodgers has a fondness for rock histrionics, in his own way. While Freddie was fond of opera and British show hall theatrics, performing with over the top campiness, Rodgers is firmly of rock lineage, but is pretty comfortable holding the stage himself, and even if his vocal stylings may not have the pitch and timbre of Mercury, he still maintains a powerful voice that can hit the extremes when needed. Maybe some of his posing and stage antics seem a bit forced, but it seems that he's becoming comfortable with fronting a band very different from ones in his past.
The set list leans much more heavily on the harder rocking numbers than a typical Mercury fronted show would have, opening with “Tie Your Mother Down”. The mix was maybe a little weak on Rodger's voice, but his voice kind of covers much of the middle frequencies, so I think it would be hard to mix it into the forefront. It's probably also wise that they don't try.
Several times, Brian May and Roger Taylor stepped up to do some vocals. A high point was hit when May sat down at the front of the runway with a 12 string guitar (and a vacant stool for Freddie) to sing “Love of my Life” with the crowd joining in. Very pretty. Later, Taylor sang “I'm In Love With My Car” and made me think briefly that Queen could quite ably followed Genesis path by bringing the drummer out to step in as singer. But maybe Roger Taylor isn't quite the ham that Phil Collins is.
I'm not a huge fan of drum solos. Actually, I hate them. But they're a good time to go get beer. This drum solo was mercifully short, and livened up by letting the session guys jam a little bit. There are also three Bad Company interludes that were pretty popular with the classic hits crowd, but the songs pale next to Queen's more textured, complex sound, and I would have preferred a couple more Queen songs instead.
The session guys. Nobody ever mentions them (except Wikipedia. Gotta love the Wiki) Jamie Moses on guitar, Spike Edney on keyboards, and bass-man Danny Miranda from Blue Oyster Cult on the Monster Bass. I love that guy, he has so much fun. Queen wisely decided to go for a more full throated approach to reproducing the complex layered studio versions of songs, and it really paid off. The additional voices made the backing vocals work, especially on the anthemic numbers like the show-closing “We Are The Champions” Actually, “Champions” and “Crazy Little Thing Called Love” were the two points at which Paul Rodgers made perfect sense as a vocalist, and actually fit the material better than Freddie Mercury might have. The vocal trade offs on “Under Pressure” also worked surprisingly well with the additional throats.
It wasn't all satisfying though. “Radio Ga Ga” showcased some truly awful lyrics. Although I understand the sentiment, I really think they should drop this clunker from their setlist. Forever. There's so much other stuff that would work better. Also, Brian May's guitar interlude was overly indulgent and more than a bit boring. As my wife said “It's certainly nice that he's having a good time.” OK, he's a guitar god and maybe he deserves it but, jeez, enough already.
The stage show itself was pretty simple but effective. Queen, more than any other band I've seen, make use of lighting from the back to overload the audience. Also makes for more effective audience connection, when the band can see the people out there. In addition, there were a couple of film montages, one showing the band in about 1975 or so in Japan; and the other during the operatic portion of “Bohemian Rhapsody” highlighting Freddie Mercury. The band made a point of keeping Freddie as part of the show without being maudlin about it.
It wasn't a sellout crowd, by a long shot. Most people share Zelmo's assessment “Queen without Freddy? Why Bother?” But to their credit, this didn't phase the band (Unlike those posers in Genesis, who broke up rather than play for less than 80,000 people. Tossers) . Brian May expressed appreciation for “allowing me to play Rock Star once again” and the smallish crowd didn't lack for enthusiasm. like Cheap Trick, they may not be able to hit the heights they once did, but in the end, it's still about playing music. And it's better than working for a living.
Another negative. When did we all get so old? Although enthusiastic, the crowd couldn't even muster a good lighter wave for the encore. Everybody stop smoking? There was certainly no stray whiffs of that sweet leaf. Nobody puked on my shoes, although someone did spill their water on my coat. (Water. Couldn't you even spill a beer?) I know, I know, it was the Bradley Center, but at least the corporate sponsorship was limited to VH-1. In tribute to Lester Bangs, someone should tour with Vick's cough syrup as a sponsor.
Also: $35 t-shirts. Give me a motherfuckin break.
Arbeit Macht Frei, Part II
3 hours ago
Ah, you beat me to it. Actually, your perspective is much better informed than my own, as I was not at the concert. I've merely heard the Rodgers' version of Champions on the radio and saw a few other highlight takes on the local nightly news from the Bradley Center show.
ReplyDeleteSo, it was interesting to get a first-hand perspective. Oddly enough, as I was reading the post, I'm Going Slightly Mad popped onto my Windows Media Player. Kinda spooky.
It would have been interesting to have been there, because I have to say that the Rodgers' version of Champions does absolutely nothing for me. His voice is still great-- but not for Queen songs. At least for me. I do give him some props for even attempting to fill Freddie's spandex. The only guy I can think of that might be harder to follow would be Bowie, and since he was never really part of a band, it's not really the same thing.
Mercury was simply one of kind.
Oh, and I'll just say "mega dittos" (grin) about the Radio Ga Ga comment.
Everybody agrees Freddie was without peer. Although I can think of a couple of other front men that may be just as hard to replace. Robert Plant. Shane McGowan. Debbie Harry (I guess I meant front persons). Gordon Gano. Bono. Geddy Lee. Michael Stipe.
ReplyDeleteI am confused. didja hear Rodgers' version of "We are the Champions" or are you referring to some other track off the album?
it sounds like hearing it on the radio allows you to concentrate too much on his voice, but the live setting really emphasized the anthemic nature of the song itself.
We also had to remark that it was funny to hear "We Will Rock You" in the Bradley Center, which is certainly no stranger to that particular song, but without the syncopation of a bunch of rowdy drunken sports fans nearly completely failing to hit the beat.
And one thing I forgot: the new song that Queen and Paul Rodgers collaborated on, "Take Love" is not bad. Not bad at all.
I just finished listening to "Return of the Champions".
ReplyDeleteThe Free and Bad Company songs rock because Paul Rogers belongs there. The Queen "covers" compel me to kick Paul in the nads to inspire a higher vocal register. I finally breathe a sigh of relief with Bohemian Rhapsody.
It's time to let go.
Then we agree Z. It's time to let go and move on. which is what Queen are doing.
ReplyDeleteY'know, there are people who refuse to listen to Marillion with H on vocals, or Genesis with Collins too.
I'm not a big fan of Paul Rodgers and I didn't care for the Free Company segments of the show.
But hey! if you want to make up your mind without seeing the band, no one can stop you.
Will I go to see them if they come around again? If they release some compelling new music, maybe. If it's just a rehash, probably not. Are they the band they were when Mercury fronted? Certainly not. They've got some work to do. Can they do it? Brian May and Roger Taylor are talented enough, if they choose to work at it. No way to predict the future.
Is Justin Hawkins a respectable successor to freddie Mercury? Nah. He's got the form down, but not the ,style.
Silent Mike says that some of Snopek's friends did some load ins for Queen around Wisconsin back in the early 70's. Mercury was a total hound dog, if you stood still too long he'd do you. He didn't put on the persona, he invented it.
I hate to admit that I'm on the young side for Queen, so I gotta defend Justin Hawkins. "Getcher Hands Off My Woman"??? Genius!
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of bands who have changed frontmen, have you heard about the New Cars? Instead of Ric Ocasek, they have Todd Rundgren. Veddy interesting. He is even adopting Ocasek's arch vocal stylings.
You hate to admit being young? That's funny.
ReplyDeleteI'm giving the Darkness another chance, but I'm still not digging Hawkins use of falsetto. The band rawks tho.
Overall, I'm more into the Rock n Roll Soldiers (crappy name, but they kicked at Summerfest last year) or Muse for new glammy rock.
Oh, and the New Cars leaves my heads hurting. It's like Bizzarro Supergroup.
ReplyDeleteI like Todd a lot, saw his recent tour with Joe Jackson.
But... Easton and Hawkes may be the musical foundation, but part of the Cars was the songwriting and the vocalists, which are lacking without the participation of Ocasek or Ben.
And... Todd Rundgren? Where does this come from? I guess they had some New Wavey stuff wiith Utopia, and there was one song on Road To Utopia that sounded a lot like the Cars, but I don't think Rundgren sang that.
Well, I give up. I'm gonna say that musicians have the right to keep on making music however they want, and I will evaluate it based on the only metric that matters- do I like it or not.