One can't doubt that the American objective in Iraq has failed. . . .
Our mission has failed because Iraqi animosities have proved uncontainable by an invading army of 130,000 Americans. . . . .
[Bush] will certainly face the current development as military leaders are expected to do: They are called upon to acknowledge a tactical setback, but to insist on the survival of strategic policies. Yes, but within their own counsels, different plans have to be made. And the kernel here is the acknowledgment of defeat. . . .
Howard Dean:
Saying the “idea that we're going to win the war in Iraq is an idea which is just plain wrong,” Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean predicted today that the Democratic Party will come together on a proposal to withdraw National Guard and Reserve troops immediately, and all US forces within two years. . . .
“I've seen this before in my life. This is the same situation we had in Vietnam. Everybody then kept saying, 'just another year, just stay the course, we'll have a victory.' Well, we didn't have a victory, and this policy cost the lives of an additional 25,000 troops because we were too stubborn to recognize what was happening.”
What's the difference?
One is a rightwinger. One is a Democrat.
One was flamed, vilified, and threatened with hanging for sedition. (Sedition? How about prosecuting him for licentiousness while we're working those eighteenth century standards). The Other? We'll see, I guess; Buckley's statement was from this past weekend.
Based on recent history, I expect Rush and the LittleGreenClones to whip on ol Bill for all they're worth, exhuming any and all minor statements and expressions of empathy as evidence of his secret Left Wing Status, and then to excoriate him and label him a closet liberal and Osama Lover.
Hey, Join the Friggin Club, Bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment