In the new year, I resolve to try, on at least an intermittent basis, to understand the goals and aspirations of the people I disagree with.
In a pre-emptive effort, here is a link to a Dictionary of Republicanisms.
So that explains quite a bit. It's not that we're necessarily opposed to the other's positions... hey wait. It is too.
Here are some choice morsels:
alternative energy sources n. New locations to drill for gas and oil
compassionate conservatism n. Poignant concern for the very wealthy
democracy n. A product so extensively exported that the domestic supply is depleted
faith n. The stubborn belief that God approves of Republican moral values despite the preponderance of textual evidence to the contrary
habeas corpus n. Archaic. (Lat.) Legal term no longer in use (See Patriot Act
Miller, Zell n. The man who shot and killed Alexander Hamilton after a particularly tough interview on Hardball
woman n. 1. Person who can be trusted to bear a child but can't be trusted to decide whether or not she wishes to have the child. 2. Person who must have all decisions regarding her reproductive functions made by men with whom she wouldn't want to have sex in the first place
Go enjoy.
Surf's Up, Suckwads!
9 hours ago
Happy New Year TC! An admirable resolution.
ReplyDeleteThose definitions are pretty good. Much funnier than most of what I read from either side these days.
Of course, if you truly want to try to "understand" conservatives (not necessarily the same thing as Republicans, btw) you should probably read something besides The Nation. You'll probably want to work up to it, though-- don't want to shock the system too much. =) Maybe start with The New Republic and work your way rightwards.